![]() ![]() And, speculation by others is, that particular rabbit hole is not exactly expected to end just below the surface. It is just that, at this point in time, I have no idea how deep the rabbit hole is. If I thought that I could watch a 5 minute video and know enough to do it myself, I’d do it. It is very difficult for me to decide if I personally want to make that investment with my current knowledge base. As can be seen by my OP, I have a whopping total of four(4) 3D models that would complete most of my KiCad projects. ![]() One great point made by the author is that it takes an investment in time and effort with no real clear idea if it will be worth it after all is said is done. Just watch the marble machine guys video where he has one of the autodesk guys basically telling him that he is pushing 360 maybe a bit too hard. It can’t happen with the Part WB.Īnd additionally: fusion is at the very low end of MCAD products. I have gone through some of them and already forgotten what I learned. But with Part Design there would be no hope of completing this without following at least one full-blown tutorial. Like the rest of FreeCAD, the UI isn’t the most intuitive. Now it’s ready to be exported with StepUp.Īctually the most difficult part (excuse the pun) is learning how to use the aligner tools (presuming you already know how to use StepUp).Select each of the two shapes and give them material or color.Select the bottom of the cube and center it on X/Y with the aligner tools of Manipulator.Taking Sprig’s button, these are roughly the steps: No pins, no chamfers or roundings, just 90 degree corners. Remember that I was talking about simple models which can be abstracted to one or three boxes and cylinders. Now I can easily create simple parts within minutes. I tried Maui’s Manipulator and it does what was promised, thank you. Part WB is immediately intuitive because you only give dimensions. Using Part Design, which means sketches, is a whole new world to learn. The part workbench is not really a good workbench to use for something like this. ![]() (In a true skeletton workflow the idea is that not even your assembly will break as long as your changes to the skeleton are not too bad) It is mainly meant for being able to easily change underlying parameters while your model does not break. In most cases this means you have some definition of a set of planes and sketches that you then reference to build up your model.īut you can also simply use a set of common parameters defined in a spreadsheet object.Īnd yes of course this workflow might be a bit too much for a static object like a relay. The gist is that you separate the part that holds your parameters and the part that makes your model. Sadly this is not yet fully supported by freecad as one can not have reference objects referenced from different files. Read up on skeleton design flow if you want the full on details. (Not even expensive CAD tools manage to guarantee this.) The main reason why this breaks down is that there is no real way to have a guarantee that a particular face stays as is in the original body. ![]() This is however not how one works in 3d modeling. Yes it might seem tempting to use features like faces of other bodies as the input for something else. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |